The Hack of Our Times
It’s exactly four years since The Guardian first reported the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Since then, a whistleblower emerged, with evidence to the fact that the company had gained access to personal details of millions of Facebook users (figures range from 50 to 90 million), in an attempt to profile American voters and influence their behaviour. But this is more a Facebook scandal than a CA one; for the dire implications of how Facebook and other tech companies treat our personal data reach further than a second-rate political consulting firm’s activities.
If there was ever a good time for a book like Shoshana Zuboff’s The Age of Surveillance Capitalism to make it to the shortlist for the Business Book of the Year, it was now. The Guardian now thinks that the scandal has changed the world.
Year 3 student Omar Aldajani reflects on the scandal.
Brown & Williamson, or how to create an addiction
Made famous by the 1995 interview on CBS programme 60 Minutes with scientist Jeffrey Wigand, the whistleblower who had been Vice-President of Research & Development at Brown & Williamson, and “The Insider” movie released four years later, the case of a tobacco company knowingly engaging in creating a harmful addiction became such a scandal, that the Food and Drug Administration tried to have its product removed from the market entirely. Unsurprisingly, their attempt eventually failed, on grounds of jurisdiction, despite Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s argument that the case merited an exception to the normal proceedings under the FRAC doctrine. But the investigation created a momentum that led to the signing of a Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) between the Attorneys General of 46 states and the four largest manufacturers of cigarettes in the US (including B&W), thereby they agreed to restrict their advertising targeting youth and create a fund dedicated to reducing youth smoking.
Maria Santos and Sophie Madelrieux reflect on the details of the case, and its impact.
Click here to read their articles:
Wells Fargo, from lived values to charges of fraud
For a company that was proudly declaring they believed “in values lived, not phrases memorised” and that “if you want to find out how strong a company’s ethics are, don’t listen to what its people say, watch what they do” (2012), the actions of Wells Fargo’s people are far from being a good letter of recommendation on its legal behaviour, let alone its ethics.
Three years ago, the company was charged with breach of contract, fraud, identity fraud and hacking, whereby over 5000 of its employees were creating fake accounts for clients who had never authorised these, in an attempt to sell unwanted products. As of today, Wells Fargo paid fines of nearly $200 million and over $2.6 million compensations to customers. But is this enough? Has justice been achieved?
Yasmin Fisher, Eileen Tan and Nadine Shehadeh investigate.
Click here to read their articles:
A credit rating company’s role in the financial crisis
We have become accustomed to blaming banks – and their mortgage practices – for the financial crisis that rocked the world for nearly a decade. But what about the rating agencies – those who assign value to mortgage securities?
Jennessa Ong, Gregor Frowein and Mark Roytman investigate the role that Standard & Poor played in muddling the financial waters in the US, leading to a recession that saw house prices fall by a third of their value.
A decade later, the question remains: who watches the witness?
Click here to read their articles:
SEC v. Stratton Oakmont
If you thought that Lehman Brothers was a unique case, think again.
Antonio Tuason argues that Stratton Oakmont came close, in the way they defrauded investors and manipulated stock.
Click here to read his article.
The Panama Papers – Reconsidering Privacy vs. Transparency
Luise Hasse, Regent’s University London
17 December 2018
In 2015, a historical leak shook the world – An anonymous source, calling itself “John Doe”, leaked over 11.5 million documents by the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca which contained confidential, private, and financial information, of almost 215,000 offshore entities. It has been the biggest data leak in human history. Various legal investigations and trials were initiated against Mossack Fonseca, the Panamanian government, the entities revealed in the papers, the publishers of the papers – but none for the source of the leak. “John Doe” cooperated with its Prosecutors to be legally protected from any trials in exchange for helping investigations against Mossack Fonseca. However, according to international law, leaking would be considered a criminal activity and be subject to substantial trials. What is even more important – the crime initiated various debates related to transparency and privacy, two concepts that conflict heavily on both a legal as well as ethical, basis. This essay intends to discuss what should have been considered within the complexity of such a case and shed light on what actions should be taken in future cases.
The WannaCry Cyber Attack: A Case Analysis
7 November 2018
In May of 2017, the WannaCry ransomware attack infected more than 200,000 computers across 150 countries by sending phishing emails to vulnerable, older-version Microsoft system networks. Key industries such as healthcare, finance, logistics, and telecommunications were affected. WannaCry caused havoc for vital societal operations. Major government services such as the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) as well as global firms such as FedEx were severely affected. Most prominently, within 60 NHS organisations, the health record information of individual patients was made unavailable, operations had to be cancelled, and many Accident & Emergency centres (A&Es) were closed.
Nearly 25 years on from the first bank robbery of the technological age
25 October 2018
In 1994, New York’s Citibank became the first large scale target for online bank robbery. Having noticed $400,000 missing from their accounts, the FBI opened their first cybercrime case. Over a four-month period, the FBI saw over $10 million in funds illegally transferred from Citibank’s accounts to personal offshore bank accounts. It was all traced back to St. Petersburg based Russian national Vladimir Levin and his 6 accomplices. Levin was sentenced to 3 years’ imprisonment by US judge Michael B. Mukasey.
The Impact of White Collar Crime on the Society
A Lehman Brothers Case Study
White collar crime is one of the biggest problems that society has to deal with in present times. Despite the fact that there are a lot of legitimate ways to make money and enhance business profitability, some businesses and their employees will always look for legal and procedural loopholes to exploit for financial gains. Lehman Brothers is a good case to analyze when it comes to white collar crime, the legal loopholes that have always undermined the ability to ensure justice, and their impacts on the society.
Five years since Rudy Kurniawan, arguably the world’s most famous perpetrator of wine fraud, was convicted and sentenced to ten years in prison. Advanced students in Liberal Arts at Regent’s University London share their thoughts on the case and what can be learnt from it.
The One Who Didn’t Get Away
31st October 2017
The case in question is about wine counterfeiting, which took place in the early 2000s and lasted until the incarceration of Rudy Kurniawan in 2012. At first sight the story appears to be quite simple and gives the impression that maybe this is not the first and most definitely not the last instance when the labels on wine bottles are inconsistent with their content.
Kurniawan made a fortune by selling his homemade wines to private clients who were willing to pay a large amount of money to enjoy rare vintage wines (BBC News, 2014). It is odd how no one in the wine industry became suspicious until 2012 of Kurniawan and that he was selling counterfeit wines; in fact, Kurniawan received several awards and recognition from wine experts as well (Samuel, 2017). While in most of the cases Kurniawan was able to sell counterfeit wines successfully through auctions, one of his most momentous mistakes was when he dated and auctioned Clos Saint Denis wines between 1945 and the 1970s, even though Domaine Ponsot only started bottling that particular wine in 1982. This basic mistake led to the series of lawsuits against Kurniawan and the growing concerns that Kurniawan’s labels were not genuine (Cumming, 2016).
The Bitter Taste of Wine
Anood Al Sharif
30th September 2017
Rudy Kurniawan’s birth name was Zhen Wang Huang, also known as “Dr. Conti”. He is a criminal who stole, lied, and cheated many people. He made a fortune and broke a wine auction record by $10 million dollars by selling fake wine. He was sentenced to ten years in prison in August 2012. He was Promoted in 2006 and his reputation was booming for eight years till he got caught. The FBI and CIA found a lot of evidence that proved Rudy is guilty of his actions. He was remaking very old wine bottles that don’t exist or exist and are hard to find.
The Judge made the 37-year old pay $28.7 million to the victim and $20 million as forfeiture agreement. He was mixing the wines to make them taste as though they were old and expensive. In one year, he had made 12,000 fake bottles of wine and sold them at a very high price in 2006. “Kurniawan was faking Grand-Crus and playing for high stakes at the big table, with fellow “whales” of the wine collecting wines” (Charney, 2016, p. 42). Imagine millions of dollars were spent on fake wine bottles. People who spend that amount of money are usually CEO’s, shareholders, Collectors, or very rich people.
The Corruption of Global Football
2 December 2015
The Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) acts at the international governing body of association football, futsal, and beach football. From a once humble start in 1904, the organization now governs the sport between 208 member countries (BBC, 2015). This includes the countries under the continental football bodies of CONMEBOL (South America) and CONCACAF (Caribbean, Central, and North America), who oversee major tournaments such as the Gold Cup and Copa America. Please click here to read the full article.
The Fall of Barings Bank
26 November 2015
In late February of 1995 the world was blindsided by the news that a single man had defrauded Great Britain’s oldest acting merchant bank to the tune of £827 million in losses. This man was Nick Leeson, a young trader in his mid-twenties from Watford that had been sent to Singapore to run Barings Bank’s derivatives trading desk. Starting in 1992, Leeson gambled on future market fluctuations, and eventually started losing more than he was winning. Hiding these losses in a secret trading account, Leeson’s debts began to quickly snowball. When the Kobe Earthquake hit Japan on 17 January, 1995 the Asian stock market plummeted, taking Leeson’s remaining investments with it. Twenty years later, the tale of this worldwide financial superpower being reduced to nothing as a result of one man’s faults acts as a benchmark for all other large-scale financial scandals. Please click here to read the full article.
Trial of Dewey & LeBouef Executives Continues
25 November 2015
Top executives at law firm await the decision of the jury. Currently, Dewey & LeBouef LLP executives are undergoing trial, all faced with numerous charges. The trial has been ongoing since May of 2015, and now, former top executives Steven Davis, Stephen DiCarmine, and Joel Sanders await the jury’s decision to conclude the trial. This article discusses the trial, the charges, and details of evidence carelessly left behind by the three individuals. Please click here to read the full article.
Decade Long Ponzi Scheme Comes to an End
5 October 2015
In February of 2014, Deepal Wannakuwatte was arrested by the FBI for committing one of the longest running ponzi schemes in Sacramento history. Wannakuwatte’s white-collar crime came to an end and he was charged with three cases of fraud and incurred $3 million in fines. For more than ten years he convinced over 150 investors to trust in his Sacramento based companies, International Manufacturing Group (IMG) and Relyaid Global Heath Care. Wannakuwatte fraudulently earned over $230 million from these investors, which included individuals, businesses, government agencies, and financial institutions. In November he was sentenced to 20 years in prison and to pay restitution to his victims. Since his sentencing, both of his businesses have filed for bankruptcy and Wannakuwatte has also personally filed for bankruptcy. Please click here to read the full article.
Medical Fraud Brought to Light
23 September 2015
Owner of Prairie View Hospice is sentenced to three years in prison for medical fraud. Prairie View Hospice, Inc. is located in Oklahoma, United States. Prairie View Hospice was supposed to provide different services to Medicare companies. These services include, “providing healthcare, medication, medical equipment, and other goods and services to terminally ill patients.” (United States Department of Justice, 2015). In 2014, the owner of Prairie View, Paula Kluding, was found guilty on “39 separate counts relating to Medicare fraud, conspiracy, obstruction of a federal audit, and making false statements in health care matter.” (United States Department of Justice, 2014) Please click here to read the full article.
An insight into insider dealing
25 February 2015
“If you can’t beat them, join them. Or better yet, try to have them join you”. That could be a good summary for what seems to be the official strategy of SAC Capital Advisors, a hedge fund that pleaded guilty to securities fraud in November 2013 and agreed to pay a fine of $1.8 billion. The judge is yet to decide whether to approve or reject the guilty plea. In the meantime, the company owner Steven Cohen has announced that, far from shutting down the firm, he is planning its resurrection under a new name and style.
As part of his commitment to reform the way the firm operates, he is looking to hire a former prosecutor or securities regulator to monitor the firm’s trading activities. Please click here for more information. Incidentally, it was Mr Preet Bharara, the so-called “sheriff of Wall Street”, who took down eight of the firm’s employees, and who takes the credit for the company’s guilty plea itself.
The question on everyone’s mind now is – will he go after Steven Cohen himself? If you’re interested in finding out who is catching or joining whom, watch this space. For details of Preet Bharara’s track record in putting way insider traders since his appointment as the US attorney for the Southern District of New York, please click here. For details of his success against SAC employees, please click here.
Insider Dealing in Italy and the UK
23 February 2015
This paper firstly analyses the 2003 Directive of the European Community, detailing what all member states have to integrate. Afterwards, both the national legislation of Italy and the United Kingdom are examined, detailing the essential requirements of inside information, the insider and the criminal behaviour. Finally, an Italian insider dealing case is analysed, including its most recent development involving the European Court of Justice. Please click here to download the full report.
Insider trading conviction in Galleon case stands
19 November 2013
In 2009, the Galleon Group, one of the largest hedge fund companies in the world, was at the centre of the biggest insider trading scandal in US history. The firm closed in October 2009, when its founder Raj Rajaratnam and five others were charged with multiple counts of fraud and insider dealing. In 2011, Rajaratnam was convicted and sentenced to 11 years in prison. A federal court in New York has now upheld the decision. According to government, Rajaratnam made nearly $64 million in illicit profit from insider trading over the six years prior to his arrest. A former director of Goldman Sachs, Rajat Gupta, was ordered to pay a penalty of £9 million and banned from serving in any public company for having passed corporate secrets to Rajaratnam. For details of the 2011 conviction please click here.
Olympus executives sentenced
4 July 2013
Tsuyoshi Kikukawa, former chairman of Olympus, and executives Hisashi Mori and Hideo Yamada, received suspended jail sentences for falsifying accounts to cover up losses of £1 billion on the company’s speculative investments. Last year, they admitted lying to regulators and shareholders for over a decade, trying to hide the loss. Mr Kikukawa and Mr Yamada were given three-year sentences and Mr Mori a two-and-a-half-year sentence. Suspended sentences are the norm in cases of false accounting in Japan, especially when the perpetrators have not profited personally from their crime. Please click here for the full article.
Jail term cut for Enron chief executive
22 June 2013
Jeffrey Skilling, the former chief executive of Enron, has his jail term cut to 14 years. He was originally sentenced to over 24 years in 2006 over the collapse of Enron in 2001, which was one of the biggest corporate scandals in the world over the last decade. The resentencing comes after an agreement was reached between Skilling and federal prosecutors, under which the former Enron boss would drop his appeal and forfeit $40m in assets seized by the government. Please click here for the full article.
Trader charged with fixing rates
18 June 2013
Tom Hayes, a former trader at investment banks Citigroup and UBS, was charged with conspiring to fix key interest rates with employees at eight other financial firms. He is the first person so far charged by the Serious Fraud Office with Libor-rigging offences. He was one of three individuals arrested in December, as part of the SFO investigation. The other two were released on bail. The Serious Fraud Office has been pursuing criminal investigations since July last year. Hayes’ first hearing will take place at Southwark crown court on 4 July. Please click here for the full article.
Thyssen CEO homicide sentence reduced
Turin – 28 February 2013
Two years ago, Harald Espenhahn, the former CEO of the Italian division of Germany’s ThyssenKrupp steelmaker, was convicted of homicide for the deaths of seven workers, and sentenced to sixteen and a half years in prison. On February 28 this year, his sentence was reduced to ten years because appeal court judges ruled that Harald Espenhahn had not been deliberately negligent in cutting back on emergency services at the plant. Please click here for the full article.
Rogue trader Kerviel sentenced to jail and £4bn fine
24 October 2012
Former Société Générale employee Jerome Kerviel lost his appeal in Paris, and was sentenced to three years in prison and ordered to pay back £4 billion in losses. He was convicted in 2010 for one of the worst frauds in history, involving forgery, breach of trust, and unauthorised deals that caused the bank’s share price to fall. Kerviel is yet to be jailed, pending another appeal. Please click here for the full article.
In UBS Convictions, Parallels to the Libor Investigation
4 September 2012
Three former UBS executives were convicted on Friday in the US, for conspiracy and fraud charges for rigging bids in the municipal bond market. This may serve as a template for how prosecutors can pursue cases in the manipulation of the LIBOR in the UK. Please click here for the full article.
Jail for the fugitive tycoon Asil Nadir
23 August 2012
Two decades after he committed he stole nearly £29m from his Polly Peck International company, Asil Nadir has finally been brought to justice. The judge gave him 10 years in jail and said “You were a wealthy man who stole out of pure greed”. The empire collapsed in 1990 following a Serious Fraud Office investigation, and Nadir fled the UK in 1993 while awaiting trial. Please click here for the full article.
The Winning Record of Prosecutors on Insider Trading
21 August 2012
The record of the United States attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York is 8-0 in insider trading cases that have gone to trial since the wide-ranging investigation came to light in October 2009. Cases include the recent conviction of the hedge fund manager Douglas F. Whitman four counts of securities fraud and conspiracy, based on receiving confidential information about Marvell Technology, Google and Polycom. Under federal sentencing guidelines, the recommended sentence for Mr. Whitman is about 4 to 5 years, based on the trading profits and other factors. Please click here for the full article.
Chief of Lloyds online security admits fraud
7 August 2012
Jessica Harper, a former Lloyds bank boss, has admitted having taken £2.4m from her em-ployer through false invoices over a four-year period while working as head of fraud and se-curity for digital banking at Lloyds Banking Group. She was charged with one count of fraud by abuse of position and money laundering between September 2008 and December 2011. She also pleaded guilty to one charge of transferring criminal property. She will be sentenced at a later date. Please click here for the full article.
News of the World Executives to face charges
25 July 2012
Seven executives at the News of the World and the paper’s private investigator, Glenn Mulcaire, will face a total of 19 charges of conspiracy to hack mobile-phone voicemails. The prime minister’s former director of communications Andy Coulson and chief executive of News International Rebekah Brooks have been charged with conspiring to hack the phones of more than 600 people. The maximum penalty for each charge is two years imprisonment, or a fine, or both – and it is at the judge’s discretion whether any sentences would be served concurrently. CPS thinks there is a realistic prospect of securing convictions. Please click here for the full article.
Libor scandal arrests imminent
23 July 2012
U.S. prosecutors and European regulators are close to arresting individual traders and charging them with colluding to manipulate global benchmark interest rates. Please click here for the full article.
Jail sentence for son and nephew of Irish billionaire
21 July 2012
Peter Darragh Quinn failed to turn up at the high court in Dublin, and was sentenced to three months in jail for contempt. His cousin, Sean Quinn junior, is already in prison. The pair were sentenced to three months in prison at the Dublin high court for moving hundreds of millions of euros out of the reach of the now stated-owned Anglo Irish Bank. Sean Quinn senior was found guilty of the same offence but avoided jail. Instead he was ordered to co-operate with the state-owned Irish Bank Resolution Corporation (IBRC), which is attempting to find the estimated €500m (£390m) the Quinns are accused of hiding. Please click here for the full article.
Bankers to face criminal charges
15 July 2012
The Treasury is proposing to change the law to be able to bring criminal charges against bank chiefs who behave ‘recklessly’. The proposal, in a consultation document, cites the 2007 acquisition of ABN Amro by the Royal Bank of Scotland by then CEO Fred Goodwin as an example of ‘extreme risk and poor decision-making’. Please click here for the full article. (Please note that you will have to pay to download the full article)
‘Fred Goodwin Law’ to ban reckless bank directors
4 July 2012
The Treasury yesterday published a consultation document proposing rules that could prevent directors of failed banks from ever holding senior positions in finance again. Please click here for the full article.
FSA calls for tighter laws against failing bankers
1 July 2012
FSA Chairmain Adair Turner says that the law should be tightened to tackle misbehaviour in banking. The FSA had already already indicated to the Government that it felt the current available legislation did not do enough to hold directors responsible for their roles in banking scandals such as the financial crisis of 2007/8 and the current Libor crisis. Please click here for the full article.
Commentary: Richard Tudway – Corporate Governance Reform
4 July 2012
The press is again full of handwringing over the latest management failures in the British Banking System in general, and Barclays Bank Plc in particular. What is extraordinary, however, is that there is not a mention of corporate governance. Everything appears to turn on personalities like Premier League football. This is an unhelpful distraction. We need to understand the source of this pervasive failure in the stewardship of bank and non bank public corporations alike. The failure arises from our reliance on unitary boards where there is no proper or effective independent ex ante monitoring of what those who run these mega businesses are up to. Please click here for the full article.
Business as usual for Barclays boss Bob Diamond
10 November 2011
In a recent Letter to The Guardian, economist Richard Tudway denounces Bob Diamond’s lecture (Banks can be good citizens, 4 November) as an example of sophistry and deception. He suggests that what we really need is proper, thorough-going supervision with independent supervisory boards made up of representatives of the shareholders and stakeholders about which Diamond speaks so fondly. Please click here to read an extract from Bob Diamond’s lecture.
Bob Diamond’s lecture (Banks can be good citizens, 4 November) is an example of the sort of sophistry and deception we are all subjected to. Corporations are inanimate fictional entities in law. Corporations are not citizens, and it’s absurd, but intentional, that they are portrayed as if they were. Directors like Diamond and his other managers are effectively the corporation we all know as Barclays plc. It is to them we should be asking the question about their own actions as citizens. Putting this irrelevant corporate entity in between is intended to suggest there is another entity which the directors and managers are there, in some sense, to tame. This is a smoke screen: a grand deception.
What we need is proper, thorough-going supervision with independent supervisory boards made up of representatives of the shareholders and stakeholders about which Diamond speaks so fondly. These supervisory boards would make their voice clear on what the corporation should or should not be doing to make money. They would also settle the vexed issue of executive pay. But Diamond wants none of that sort of democratic control and accountability. He wants to continue to control the business, at the same time daring to suggest they are all working to make Barclays Bank plc a better citizen. Pull the other leg, Mr Diamond. You just want the clamour to go away and to get back to making money at everyone else’s expense. (Richard Tudway, Centre for International Economics). Please click here to read the letter to the Guardian.
11 October 2010: Chief Executive of Hungarian company that caused the toxic sludge spill arrested
Mr Zoltan Bakonyi, the chief executive of the industrial plant at the centre of the toxic sludge spill in Hungary has been taken in for questioning by the police. So far, eight people have lost their lives due to the toxic spill. The Hungarian PM Viktor Orban said the company would be temporarily nationalised and that those responsible for the disaster should bear the financial consequences. Click here to read the full article.
French rogue trader Jerome Kerviel sentenced to 3 years in prison
5 October 2010
The former Société Générale trader has been found guilty of forgery, unauthorised computer use and breach of trust. He will spend 3 years in prison and repay the damages of 4.9bn euros ($7bn; £4bn) which the bank said it lost through his risky trades. Please click here for the full article.
Commentary – Insuring against corporate crimes, by Neil Foster, University of Newcastle, Australia
Can and should corporate directors and officers obtain insurance for, or indemnify themselves against, the possibility of a criminal fine following a conviction? Or should this be deemed to be against public policy? The general rule is that one should not be able to insure against one’s own wrongdoing. Criminal laws would lose much of their deterrent effect if the rule were otherwise in respect of fines-only offences. Please click here for the full article.
Former South African top policeman convicted for bribery
2 July 2010
Jackie Selebi, South Africa’s former police chief, has been found guilty of corruption in a landmark case. He was accused of links to organised crime and taking 1.2m rand (£103,000) in bribes to turn a blind eye to drug trafficking. Selebi faces at least 15 years in prison, but will remain free on bail until sentencing on 14 July. Please click here for the full article.
Kerviel trial draws to a close
25 June 2010
Jerome Kerviel will have to wait until the autumn to find out if he will be sent to prison for four years or ordered to pay back the £4bn that Société Générale claims to have lost through his unauthorised trades. Please click here for the full article.
Supreme Court limits the use of a federal fraud law
24 June 2010
The US Supreme Court significantly narrowed the scope of a law often used by federal prosecutors in corruption cases and called into question the fraud convictions of Jeffrey K. Skilling, a former chief executive of Enron, and Conrad M. Black, a newspaper executive convicted of defrauding his media company. Please click here for the full article.
Trial against Jerome Kerviel starts at the Palais de Justice, in Paris
9 June 2010
The 33-year old former trader faces charges of breach of trust, computer hacking, and falsification of records leading to Société Générale losing £4 billion. Kerviel admits he took excessive risks, but insists his bosses knew what he was doing and encouraged him while he was winning. The trial is expected to last three weeks. Please click here for the full article.
Kerviel has just published his own account of what happened, in a book called The Spiral: Memoirs of a Trader. This, as well as his experience, bears an eerie resemblance to that of Nick Leeson, who was also engaged in high-risk arbitrage before causing the collapse of Barings Bank in 1995. La plus ca change, la plus ca reste le meme chose…please click here for more details about Kerviel’s Memoirs.
New Bill on Safety Duties for Company Directors shelved
18 May 2010
The Bill, which was introduced in Parliament on the 19 January by Labour MP Frank Doran, never made it through to its second reading scheduled to take place on 23 April 2010. Please click here for the full article. Please note that in order to read the article, you have to subscribe to the Business Database.
Bank staff charged for alleged insider-dealing
1 April 2010
Seven men were charged by the Financial Services Authority in its first prosecution of an alleged insider dealing ring. The FSA named them as Pardip Saini, Paresh Shah, Neten Shah, Bijal Shah, Truptesh Patel, Mitesh Shah and Ali Mustafa. The 13 charges brought against the men relate to illegal trading in shares of 12 companies between 2006 and 2008. One of the seven, Mitesh Shah, was also charged with money laundering. Please click here for the full article.
Rio Tinto employees sentenced in bribery case in China
29 March 2010
Four employees of the British-Australian mining giant Rio Tinto, including an Australian citizen, were convicted by a Chinese court on Monday and sentenced to seven to 14 years in prison for accepting millions of dollars in bribes and stealing commercial secrets.
SFO investigates Alstom directors
24 March 2010
Three company directors are being investigated by the Serious Fraud Office for bribes-for-contracts. Please click here for the full article.
New arrest in connection with the FSA’s operation against insider dealing
24 March 2010
A seventh man has been arrested under suspicion of insider dealing, in an operation involving three financial institutions: hedge fund Moore Capital, leading German bank Deutsche Bank and Exane BNP, partly owned by French bank BNP Paribas. Those arrested have yet to be named. Please click here for the full article.
Three MPs and one peer charged with false accounting for their expenses claims
5 February 2010
The Director of Public Prosecutions has decided to prosecute three MPs and one peer for false accounting. Elliot Morley, Jim Devine, David Chaytor and Lord Hanningfield will face charges under the Theft Act 1968 section 17, over allegedly improper expense claims. Please click here for the full article.
New Bill on Safety Duties for Directors
19 January 2010
A Labour MP is pressing for a new law to place legally binding, explicit safety duties on company directors. Aberdeen North MP Frank Doran presented his Health and Safety (Company Director Liability) Bill in a House of Commons debate on 19 January. The Bill is scheduled to receive a second reading on Friday 23 April. The TUC, trade unions, personal injury lawyers, health and safety campaigners and victims’ advocates have all called for explicit legal safety duties on company directors. Please click here for a summary of the Bill.
11 January 2010: Claims of prosecutorial misconduct in two cases of white-collar crime
A federal judge dismissed charges against three Broadcom executives accused of options backdating, because of changes in witness testimony. Another similar claim was raised in the prosecution of a KB Homes executive. Click here to read the full article.
International comparison of health & safety duties imposed on company directors
A 2007 Centre for Corporate Accountability report shows that seven out of the nine countries studied contain safety legislation that imposes positive safety obligations upon either directors or senior managers of companies. These are: Germany, France, Italy, Sweden, Japan, Canada (four out of fourteen jurisdictions) and Australia (two out of nine jurisdictions). There is, in addition, another category of jurisdictions which, whilst not imposing explicit positive duties upon directors, do impose significant responsibilities through the creation of offences that are targeted at directors. This category includes four Australian states. There are also, however, jurisdictions which either impose minimal or no duties upon directors. Two countries – USA and Holland – do not impose any obligations. Please click here to download the full report.
Health & Safety responsibilities of company directors in the UK
Whilst there are clear, positive duties imposed on company directors and senior managers concerning the financial management of their organisation, the same is not true insofar as health & safety responsibilities are concerned. Directors have no individual legal duties in relation to the safety of their company operations. It is only the company as a separate legal entity and the employees of the company, which have duties under the Health & Safety at Work Act 1974. This means that company directors have no positive obligations in relation to the health and safety of their organisation, and therefore cannot be held individually accountable for safety failures which cause great harm and even death at the workplace. The only exception, Section 37 of the 1974 Act, mentions those cases where a director can be prosecuted – namely, where the offence was caused by “consent, connivance, or neglect” on the part of the director. This however only imposes a duty upon directors to take action if they are already aware that their company is committing an offence; it does not impose a positive obligation on directors to inform themselves of offences being committed, or indeed to prevent offences from being committed.
History of lobbying for directors’ duties reform in the UK
Please click here for the history of lobbying for directors’ duties reform in the UK.